The organization is supported by the diversity of individuals.
The diversity of individuals is a condition for the organization to be alive.
Indeed, what drives the organization to develop is its constituents' diversity.
Diversity of individuals is the state the organization functions well.
If the diversity seems to be constrained in the organization, the organization is surely going wrong direction.
The "diversity of individuals" is an old subject for the philosophy. Indeed, it is the dogma of the philosophical pragmatism and the premise of democracy (the political stance based on the pragmatism). Their standpoint is : "diversity of individuals" is definitely present before everything.
And I would like to go further saying that "continually drived to become diverse" is the meaning of "life" (in contrast to "still").
Thus, naturally, system designer encounters the confrontation of different skewness of individuals. The designer should respect this diversity, thinking that each skewness has a reason.
System design is of diverse-user-experience-based.
And, the skewness of designer her/him-self is also the prime key issue s/he should consider. The designer has her/his own perceptions of how 'good' or 'bad' a system is, which is skewed by her/his personal backgrounds and specialties within given fields.